Modern Tank Destroyers - A new tank destroyer concept built for the Polish Army could be the most effective tank destroyer in any army. The unnamed vehicle is equipped with up to 24 Brimstone armor-piercing rounds, capable of firing anti-tank rounds and destroying enemy tank units virtually invisible.
Poland is a country that is stuck between the great military powers. Invaded by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II, it was forced to join the Warsaw Pact during the Cold War. Today, Poland makes up most of NATO's eastern flank and is particularly vulnerable to attacks by Russian ground forces against Moscow's main battle tanks.
Modern Tank Destroyers
Poland recently requested a new tank destroyer. Tank destroyers are armored vehicles designed for firepower and mobility, designed to position themselves in front of enemy tank columns and engage them with long-range guns or shells. Although they sometimes resemble tanks in appearance, tank destroyers forgo armor, which allows them to quickly punch holes in friendly tank defenses.
Where Does The Tank Go From Here?
The new Polish tank killer is the result of a collaboration between the Polish PZG companies and the European (mainly British) MBDA. Concept art shows a box launcher with 12 Brimstone missiles mounted on a Cold War BMP-1 IFV chassis. The vehicle is also equipped with a US .50 caliber heavy machine gun with a remote weapon.
Another image shows the system mounted on the chassis of an unidentified armored vehicle. It shows the system installed in an eight-round box for a total of 24 Brimstone rounds.
A Brimstone missile will be loaded onto a Tornado fighter jet during airstrikes against IS forces in 2015.
Brimstone is a British-developed medium-range air-to-surface missile system. The round is similar to the American Hellfire armor piercing, but differs in several ways. Like Hellfire, Brimstone uses millimeter wave radar to detect armor. This allows the new Polish tank destroyer to engage enemy tanks up to a distance of 12 kilometers (or approximately 7.45 miles).
Has Anyone Noticed The New Chinese Tank Destroyer?
Unlike hellfire, Brimstone has more interesting indirect fire abilities. The Brimstone can fire toward a designated target area and locate and engage tanks and armored vehicles in enemy contact.
If Brimstone proves only 90 percent effective (MBDA itself claims 98.7 percent combat effectiveness), a Brimstone attack could destroy 50 tanks and 22 armored fighting vehicles of a Russian battalion (BTG). Enough to make unit combat ineffective. The two weak BTGs would complement the Russian tank brigade, a parent unit that could not attack offensively.
So far, no other country has proposed a weapon like the Polish tank destroyer. The U.S. military phased out its tank destroyers after the Cold War, and the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter can carry up to 16 Hellfire AP missiles. Apache helicopters are more or less limited to visual attacks.
The MBDA Tank Destroyer concept showcases the powerful ability of even a handful of armored vehicles to turn an advancing tank force to shreds in seconds.
The World Encyclopedia Of Tanks & Armoured Fighting Vehicles, Forty George |...
Can high-powered lasers save the Navy? Britain and Poland will supply Ukraine with cheap drones and fighter jets, and the US will send Sea Sparrow missiles to Ukraine.
Is the AMX-10RC a tank or...something else? The Russian Navy will send Bradley fighter jets to Ukraine, deploy hypersonic missiles in Ukrainian waters, and get new HIMARS-launched missiles.
The story of the last US submarine "Smart bombs" lost at sea where the military once planned to send troops to the moon; The story of the legendary WinchesterSanta rifle that can convert Ukrainian jet fighters is giving away at least 25 ALL-IN-ONE SETS in a raffle between everyone who grabs a package from the Christmas sale. ! br
A T-64A Hunter in a single cluster; Chieftain MK6, Includes 31 esome vehicles such as the AMX-10 RCR Bastille and the XM1 FSED.
Hetzer: Nazi Germany's Big Frankenstein Tank Destroyer
The true history of tank destroyers is quite complex and would take an entire book to describe – in fact, many books are just that. The intricacies and various details of tank destroyer doctrine would take many pages: we will have to do with brevity.
Tank destroyers (although usually unnamed) are vehicles specifically designed to destroy enemy tanks on a budget. Whether designed from the ground up or converted from another existing vehicle, their role on the battlefield has long been the same - engage the enemy at range (enough to cause the enemy to react) and then retreat (or swipe). Repeat the process.
The tank destroyer class had its golden years during World War II, when a variety of vehicles were developed or improvised to attack German tanks (the unstoppable stalwarts of the second half of the war). . . in particular, The Americans have created an entire military branch and doctrine dedicated to this goal. The most effective German vehicle of the war, the StuG III actually claimed to be a capable tank killer with the SPG and some versions.
Many of these vehicles are equipped with existing chassis (eg, the Panzer II or Panzer 38(t) for the German Marder series, the Panzer III chassis for the StuG III series, or the T-34 chassis for the Soviet SU-85 and SU-100), but this comes at a price: the gun. It is almost always stationary and can only be directed forward at a limited angle (called the gun traverse angle). Such a vehicle can ambush, hide, wait and fire to surprise the enemy, since its thin armor is not sufficiently protective.
This Is Not A Tank! A Layperson's Guide To Armored Fighting Vehicles
Of course, There were exceptions to this. American tank destroyers such as the M36 had turrets and behaved like real tanks. Often faster, but with less protection by opening the top of the turret. An extreme case is the M18 Hellcat, one of the fastest tracked vehicles of World War II. Its extreme speed is of little use, as it is often delayed by terrain or other vehicles that must be escorted.
On the other hand, The Germans built some super heavy tank destroyers like the Elefent and the formidable Jagdtiger. Although they were heavily armored, they were heavily damaged by propaganda and stories of soldiers fighting slow monsters with a reputation for being slow in combat (indeed they were defeated - some written "partisan" accounts have more Elefants destroyed than actually built). . These cars are very expensive and relatively fragile. Their guns are deadly, though. Limited experience of their crews and logistical problems made them undervalued (these subtypes disappeared after the war). On the other hand, The Soviet SU-152 and ISU-152 series were successful due to their ability to act as artillery and serve in this role for a long time (they are still used by some, for example in the Gulf War).
After the war, the tank destroyer class was quickly replaced by the main battle tank. A few post-war tank destroyer designs are important - the most famous example is the German Kanonenjagdpanzer, designed to exploit the obsolete 90mm guns left behind by the Germans after the old Patton models were decommissioned. Since then, most proposals for this type of vehicle (for example, building such a vehicle on the chassis of the Leopard 1 or Leopard 2) have remained at the experimental stage, with the Typhoon II prototype being the latest; Garbage in the class. On the Russian side, perhaps the most powerful vehicle of this type, its last type was the SU-152 Taran from 1965.
In the 1960s, While the classic class of gun-armed tank destroyers has disappeared, many designs have attempted to take their place. They can be divided into three categories.
S25 Sprut Sd
The first type is equipped with anti-tank ballistic missiles; Sometimes special vehicles with additional machine guns are included. It usually overlaps with AFVs that use the same chassis. Typical examples are the German Raketenjagdpanzer; British FV438 Swingfire or Russian Kornet missile launcher on Tigr-M chassis. The big downside to these vehicles is that they are often good at destroying enemy tanks, but useless for everything else. Because taking down a wall with an expensive ballistic missile is a colossal waste. Therefore, their role on the battlefield is limited.
The second category includes vehicles such as the M1128 Stryker, capable of destroying enemy tanks (especially older ones) with MBT-class guns, but aimed primarily at friendly infantry and light armored vehicles. These
Us army tank destroyers, tank destroyers wwii, soviet tank destroyers, ww2 american tank destroyers, modern us navy destroyers, modern american tank destroyers, war thunder tank destroyers, german tank destroyers, british tank destroyers, modern destroyers, tank destroyers ww2, british ww2 tank destroyers
0 Comments